Monday, September 7, 2015

Assessment in Early Literacy


Chapter two highlights the best motives or strategies to use when you are assessing early literacy development. This specific aspect of teaching has always been an important matter for me individually, because I have test anxiety, and have always remembered struggling when it came to pencil- and- paper formed tests. Although I believe that administered tests are a crucial aspect to the educational world, I also believe that it’s important to be sensitive to children’s backgrounds, abilities, and needs which is one of the main points that are highlighted in this chapter. When talking about tests, I believe that we hold them to be the best form of assessing children’s knowledge of a subject, but in all actuality this could be the very opposite. We must remember that although administering tests is inevitable and extremely essential to a child’s learning process, it cannot be the only source for evaluating a child’s progress.
One form is authentic assessments, which are activities that represent and reflect the actual learning that is going on within the classroom as well as outside of the classroom. This form of evaluation can be performed in a number of different methods, which include; anecdotal observation forms, daily performance samples, audio recordings, videos, pencil- and – paper forms, student evaluations, surveys and interviews, conferences, and checklists. These types of assessments are continuous over a substantial period of time, which means that it requires not only the collaboration of the teacher and the student, but the parents as well. This form of assessment must also take into the consideration that children are diverse and vary in their culture, language, and altogether have different needs.
On the other side of things, there are in-depth assessments. These include running records, informal reading inventories, and portfolio assessments. While authentic assessments can be very beneficial, they lack the understanding of each individual child’s development over an extended amount of time. The first assessment is developing running records. These are valuable because everything a child does is recorded but it’s not put on display to the child or their peers. Not only do they save the child from embarrassment and stress, they also can be useful in determining applicable material to use for instructional purposes. Informal reading is another form of in- depth assessment that is very comparable to running records, but they focus more on comprehension.
The type of testing that most people are familiar with is standardized testing. Of course like anything else, this method comes with pros and cons. One valuable aspect is that it exposes children to a variety of literacy situations. It also gives parents concrete information about their children. One of the biggest downfalls of standardized testing is that they only represent one form of assessment for the child.

As future teachers, the big question is how often to administrate tests, what type of tests should be given most often, and what overall will be most beneficial to the child? I believe that it’s extremely important to take all forms of assessment into consideration and give a variety all of them. Also, we should utilize a number of different strategies, meaning that we shouldn’t consider one single hand written test as the tell all of our students comprehending a subject. As long as we remember that our students are diverse and need individual attention when testing their knowledge in a subject, we will have a better overall learning experience.  

2 comments:

  1. Cami, you presented well thought out points. I struggle with a multitude of anxieties, the biggest being test anxiety. I could know the material front and back and still score poorly on the test. Something about sitting down with a test and recalling the material from memory makes me second-guess my answers. I agree with your position in that administered tests are a crucial aspect to teaching and many believe that testing is the best way of assessing a child’s knowledge of a subject, but it is not the only method for evaluating a child. Every child learns in his or her own way. It is unfair for a child to be assessed in an environment where he or she does not feel is most comfortable. As a teacher, it is crucial to get to know your students while taking into consideration the various cultures, languages, and ethnicities of your classroom. While you are assessing your class, it is your responsibility to make sure your students are in a relaxed environment. I understand that authentic assessments may lack the understanding of the child’s development over a time period. Running records is such a beneficial form of assessing a student. It allows confidentiality to the child to save any embarrassment or anxiety he or she may have during the testing process. I agree with your last few statements as you suggest taking on all forms of assessment in the classroom. Offering several ways to assess our students allows for less stress and more success!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Cami, you presented well thought out points. I struggle with a multitude of anxieties, the biggest being test anxiety. I could know the material front and back and still score poorly on the test. Something about sitting down with a test and recalling the material from memory makes me second-guess my answers. I agree with your position in that administered tests are a crucial aspect to teaching and many believe that testing is the best way of assessing a child’s knowledge of a subject, but it is not the only method for evaluating a child. Every child learns in his or her own way. It is unfair for a child to be assessed in an environment where he or she does not feel is most comfortable. As a teacher, it is crucial to get to know your students while taking into consideration the various cultures, languages, and ethnicities of your classroom. While you are assessing your class, it is your responsibility to make sure your students are in a relaxed environment. I understand that authentic assessments may lack the understanding of the child’s development over a time period. Running records is such a beneficial form of assessing a student. It allows confidentiality to the child to save any embarrassment or anxiety he or she may have during the testing process. I agree with your last few statements as you suggest taking on all forms of assessment in the classroom. Offering several ways to assess our students allows for less stress and more success!

    ReplyDelete